Impact Factor 2018 : 1.587 (@Clarivate Analytics)
  • Users Online: 722
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 467-473

Hepatoprotective activity of Dypsis lutescens against D-galactosamine-induced hepatotoxicity in rats and its phytoconstituents


1 Chemistry of Natural Compounds Department, National Research Centre, 33 El-Bohouth St., Dokki, 12622, Cairo, Egypt
2 Department of Pathology, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, 12622, Cairo, Egypt
3 Medical Biochemistry Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, 12622, Cairo, Egypt
4 Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Date of Submission24-Apr-2019
Date of Decision03-Jun-2019
Date of Acceptance30-Oct-2019
Date of Web Publication20-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
Walaa A El-Kashak
Chemistry of Natural Compounds Department, National Research Centre, 33 El-Bohouth St., Dokki, 12622, Cairo
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: The research fund for this work has been received from the National Research Centre, Egypt (project No. 11010325), Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2221-1691.270979

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Objective: To isolate and identify the polyphenolic constituents of Dypsis lutescens, and evaluate the hepatoprotective activity of the ethanolic extract of Dypsis lutescens leaves. Methods: Hepatoprotective, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of two doses of Dypsis lutescens ethanolic leaf extract were investigated in five groups of six rats each administered with the ethanolic extract of Dypsis lutescens leaves. Liver function parameters were assessed, histopathological study was carried out, the anti-inflammatory mediators and the antioxidant potential in the liver tissues were evaluated. In addition, the total ethanolic extract of Dypsis lutescens leaves was subjected to different chromatographic separation techniques to yield ten phenolic compounds. The isolated compounds structures were spectroscopically elucidated. Results: Hepatoprotective activity of Dypsis lutescens ethanolic extract was estimated for the first time and showed significant activity against histopathological changes induced by D-galactosamine in liver. The extract improved the liver functions. Compared to the D-galactosamine group, the architecture of the liver in the treated groups was improved in the histopathological examination. These results proved the hepatoprotective activity of Dypsis lutescens and its ability in attenuating liver oxidative damage and inflammation. Phytochemical investigations of the total extract afforded ten compounds from the genus Dypsis. Conclusions: The alcoholic extract of Dypsis lutescens exerted potential hepatoprotective action, maintaining liver health and functions.

Keywords: Dypsis lutescens, Flavonoid glycosides, Phenolic acids, Hepatoprotective, Antioxidant, Anti-inflammatory


How to cite this article:
El-Ghonemy MM, El-Kashak WA, Mohamed TK, Omara EA, Hussein J, Farrag ARH, Nassar MI, El-Kady MY. Hepatoprotective activity of Dypsis lutescens against D-galactosamine-induced hepatotoxicity in rats and its phytoconstituents. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2019;9:467-73

How to cite this URL:
El-Ghonemy MM, El-Kashak WA, Mohamed TK, Omara EA, Hussein J, Farrag ARH, Nassar MI, El-Kady MY. Hepatoprotective activity of Dypsis lutescens against D-galactosamine-induced hepatotoxicity in rats and its phytoconstituents. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 6];9:467-73. Available from: http://www.apjtb.org/text.asp?2019/9/11/467/270979




  1. Introduction Top


The liver is a vital organ and takes part in metabolisms of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids as well as in detoxification[1],[2]. In modern society, hepatic diseases as hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis and fatty liver cause serious health problems and great economic losses. In the traditional medicine, medicinal plants have been used for the treatment of hepatic diseases successfully and could promote natural healing process of the liver. Hence, this motivates further investigations for an efficient hepatoprotective drugs from natural sources[3].

Arecaceae family has been neglected chemically, probably because of the difficulty in collecting fresh material[4]. They are flowering plants in monotypic Arecales order[5]. Dypsis is a one of Arecaceae plants, and comprises 65 species that are domestic to Madagascar, Tanzania, and diverse islands in the Indian Ocean[6]. There are five Dypsis species grown in Egypt namely Dypsis lutescens (D. lutescens), Dypsis decaryi, Dypsis leptochilios, Dypsis lastelliana, and Dypsis capada.

D. lutescens is widely used as an ornamental plant, which possesses strong antioxidant and anticancer activities. Phytochemical screening of D. lutescens (Golden cane palm) revealed presence of flavonoids, tannins, lignans, triterpenes and steroids[6]. The biological and phytochemical studies on genus Dypsis are scarce. We selected species D. lutescens (Golden cane palm), isolated and identified its chemical constituents, and evaluated the hepatoprotective activity of its ethanolic extract.


  2. Materials and methods Top


2.1. Collection of D. lutescens

D. lutescens leaves (H. Wendl) were collected from El-Zohrea Botanical Garden, Giza, Egypt in April 2014, which were identified by Consultants of Plant Taxonomy, Dr. Mohamed El-Gebaly at the Ministry of Agriculture. A voucher sample (M-146) was deposited in National Research Centre’s herbarium, Egypt. The plant samples were air-dried at room temperature, powdered by electric mill, and kept in closed containers for the phytochemical and bioactivity studies.

2.2. Chemicals, biochemicals and instruments

Glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (GOT), glutamate pyruvate transaminase (GPT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and malondialdhyde (MDA) assay kits were obtained from Biodiagnostic Company (Dokki, Giza, Egypt). Silymarin and D-galactosamine (D-GaIN) were purchased from Medical Union Pharmaceuticals Company (Abou Sultan, Ismalia, Egypt) as a gelatinous capsule under the trade name of Hepaticum; each capsule contained 140 mg of silymarin. Sephadex LH-20 (Sigma-Aldrich-Steinheim, Germany), micro crystalline cellulose (E. Merk Darmstadt, Germany), and polyamide 6(Riedel-DeHaen AG, SeelzeHaen AG, SeelzeHanver, Germany) were used for column chromatography. Whatman filter papers (1 and 3 mm) were used for paper chromatography (Whatman, Maid stone, Kent, England). Whatman paper chromatography (No. 1) was performed using two systems: butanol/ acetic acid/ water at 4: 1: 5 (BAW) and 15% HOAc. Rotatory evaporator (Heidolph, Germany) used for concentration and drying of extracts and fractions. Ultraviolet lamp: (254, 365 nm, Vl, 6LC, Marine Lavalee-Cedex, France) used for localizing spots on paper, and column chromatography. ESI-MS was recorded by a Bruker APEX Π mass spectrometer. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AMX 400 MHz, at 500 MHz for 1H-NMR and 125 MHz for 13C-NMR. Proton and carbon-13 NMR chemical shifts (δ) values were reported as ppm relative to tetramethylsilane in dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 and J value in Hz.

2.3. Plant extraction and compounds identification

The dry leaves of D. lutescens (2.5 kg) were extracted with 70% ethanol followed by evaporation of the filtrate under reduced pressure, then defatted by petroleum ether and finally extracted with n-butanol, yielding a brown gum (200 g). 2D paper chromatography of the extract was performed and eluted with suitable solvent which revealed the presence of phenolic compounds, giving dark purple spots under UV light which turned orange or yellow when fumed with ammonia vapor, and giving a positive color when sprayed with FeCl3, then the extract was fractionated on polyamide 6 CC. The column was eluted with H2O-MeOH step gradient. The obtained fractions were subjected to paper chromatography using BAW and 15% AcOH as developing solvents, and the similar fractions were collected together to give four major fractions (I - IV), which were examined by 2D paper chromatography. Fraction I was obtained from the polyamide column by 20% methanol, which was separated on Sephadex LH-20 CC using H2O-MeOH as a solvent giving four subfractions. The first subfraction was separated on Sephadex LH-20 CC using H2O to afford compound 1 (60 mg). The second subfraction was eluted on Sephadex LH-20 CC starting with H2O, then methanol with decreasing polarities to give compound 2 (40 mg), while the third one was eluted on Sephadex LH-20 CC using saturated butanol to afford compound 3 (50 mg). The fourth subfraction was eluted with H2O-MeOH step gradient to give compound 4 (40 mg). Fraction Π was eluted from the polyamide column by 40% methanol, and applied on Sephadex LH-20 CC using mixtures of H2O and MeOH to give two subfractions; the first subfraction was separated using H2O, then the polarity decreased by adding MeOH to give compound 5 (20 mg). The second subfraction was fractionated on cellulose CC using H2O-EtOH, to give pure compound 6 (19 mg). Fraction III was obtained by 60% methanol from the polyamide column, and separated on preparative paper chromatography using 15% AcOH as eluent to give two compounds 7 (33 mg) and 8 (40 mg). Fraction IV was eluted from the polyamide column by 90% methanol and purified on Sephadex LH-20 CC using 80% methanol to afford two pure compounds 9 (25 mg), and 10 (20 mg). All isolated compounds were extra purified on Sephadex columns using equal ratio of methanol and water.

2.4. Animals

Albino female rats [(115.46 ± 5.72) g], from the Animal House of National Research Centre, were grouped and housed in polyacrylic cages (38 cm×23 cm×10 cm). Rats were kept and fed under normal conditions with dark and light cycle (12/12h) for a week before the experiment. The experimental procedure was approved by guidelines of the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee of National Research Centre (No.16-303), for project No. 11010325 on April 2016.

2.5. Acute toxicity study

This study was performed in two phases using twenty one rats according to Lorke[7]. In the first phase, rats were divided into three tested groups and one control group with three rats in each group. Rats in tested groups were administered with 10, 100 and 1 000 mg extract/kg body weight (b.w.) to determine the range of doses causing any toxic effect. All rats received a single dose of the extract after at least 5 d of adaptation. In the second phase, nine rats (three rats per dose) were further administered with extract at 1 600, 2 900 and 5 000 mg/kg b.w. to determine LD50 value. The extract was washed with PBS solution, dissolved in water and given orally. All rats were monitored frequently on the day of administration for 2 weeks for any sign of acute toxicity. The rats were sacrificed and then autopsied. The pathological changes of the internal organs were examined macroscopically. Weight gain is regarded as the indicator for the recovery from acute toxicity. After estimation of LD50, the doses were selected for the hepatoprotective investigations using 5% and 10% of the highest dose examined which was 5 000 mg/kg b.w. So a low dose as 250 mg/kg and a high dose as 500 mg/kg of the extract were used.

2.6. Study design

Thirty rats were grouped into five groups of six rats in each group. The first group (normal control group) was administered with distilled water 5 mL/kg orally for 8 d. The second group (D-GaIN group as model group) was injected intraperitoneally with 200 mg/ kg D-GaIN after 8 d of oral administration of distilled water. The third group (positive treatment group) received 100 mg/kg silymarin orally for 8 d. In the fourth group (D-GaIN + low dose of D. lutescens extract), low dose of the extract (250 mg/kg) was administered orally for 8 d, while, the fifth group (D-GaIN + high dose of D. lutescens extract) received high dose of the extract (500 mg/kg) orally for 8 d. On the eighth day (last day), the third, fourth and fifth groups received a single dose of D-GaIN (200 mg/kg i.p.) after 1 hour of extract administration.

2.7. Biochemical study

2.7.1. Liver functions tests

The activities of GOT, GPT, ALP, levels of serum total protein and total bilirubin were assessed according to previous literature[8],[9],[10],[11], respectively.

2.7.2. Oxidant/antioxidant parameters assays

Serum nitric oxide (NO), MDA and paraoxinase 1 (PON1) activity were measured as previously described[12],[13],[14] respectively.

2.7.3. Inflammatory markers determination

Matrix metallopeptidase 1 (MMP1) levels were assessed using ELISA by Bio-Plex Pro™ Human MMP Panel kit (Bio-Rad, USA). The procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer instructions and results were recorded on Multi-Analyte Bio-Plex®

MAGPIX™ Multiplex Reader (Bio-Rad, USA). Tissue hyaluronic acid as the indicator of liver extracellular degradation was also estimated.

2.8. Histopathological study

Rats from different groups were sacrificed at the end of the experiment, rapidly dissected and the liver was removed and kept in 10% neutral formalin for 24 h, dehydrated in ascending grades of alcohol and embedded in paraffin. Sections at 4 μm thickness were taken, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and examined under light microscope.

2.9. Statistical analysis

Statistical results were performed by one-way ANOVA, and then followed by the Tukey-Kramer test using Graph Pad software, InStat version 20. Results were reported as the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The significant level was set at P less than 0.05.


  3. Results Top


3.1. Phenolic compounds from D. lutescens

[Figure 1] illustrates ten phenolic compounds isolated from aqueous ethanolic extract of D. lutescens leaves including eight flavonoids: vicenin Π (1), prechafuroside B (4), violanthin (5), orientin (6), isoorientin (7), vitexin (8), apigenin (9), luteolin (10), together with two phenolic acids; gallic acid (2) and p-hydroxybenzoic acid (3) which were identified using different spectroscopic tools. Data of compounds 1, 4, 5 are listed in [Table 1].
Figure 1: Chemical structures of isolated compounds.

Click here to view
Table 1: 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR spectroscopic data for compounds (1, 4, 5) in DMSO-d6.

Click here to view


3.2. Acute toxicity study

The extract did not produce any obvious toxic symptoms or mortality up to 5 000 mg/kg b.w. in all groups after 14 d suggesting that LD50 of the extract were higher than 5 000 mg/kg b.w.

3.3. Biochemical examination

D-GaIN significantly increased GOT, GPT, ALP, total protein, total bilirubin, NO, MDA, hyaluronic acid and MMP1 levels, and reduced PON1 enzyme levels as compared to control group (P<0.05) [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]. D. lutescens effectively restored these changes in dose dependence, which was similar to silymarin.
Table 2: Liver functions tests.

Click here to view
Table 3: Oxidant/antioxidant parameters in different studied groups.

Click here to view
Table 4: Inflammatory markers in different studied groups.

Click here to view


3.4. Histopathological examination

The light microscopy examination revealed normal hepatocytes radiating from the central vein and blood sinusoids with prominent nucleus in control group [Figure 2]A. D-GaIN group showed disordered hepatic structure associated with centrilobular infiltration of mononuclear cells which led to severe centrilobular necrosis. Hepatocytes in these areas showed vacuolation. In addition, dilation, hemorrhage of sinusoids, activated Kupffer cells, pyknotic and apoptotic nuclei were also observed [Figure 2]B. Silymarin group showed attenuation of hepatic damage and reduction of hepatocellular necrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration. Few activated Kupffer cells and dilated blood sinusoid were also observed [Figure 2]C. Low dose of D. lutescens treated group moderately improved these changes [Figure 2]D, while high dose of D. lutescens restored histological structure and the cytoplasmic vacuoles disappeared in most hepatocytes with minimized activated Kupffer cells and dilated blood sinusoid [Figure 2]E.
Figure 2: Photomicrographs of liver sections stained with haematoxylin and eosin. A: normal control group showing normal hepatic lobule, central vein (CV), hepatocytes with prominent nuclei (N) and hepatic sinusoids (S); B: D-galactosamine group showing distorted liver architecture and intense inflammatory cells infiltrating around central vein, hepatocellular necrosis (arrowhead) with hemorrhage between hepatocytes (H), activated kupffer cells (K) and pyknotic nuclei (P); C: D-galactosamine and silymarin group showing that hepatocytes mostly had normal appearance with minimal dilated of blood sinusoids (S) and activated kupffer cells (K) (H & E ×400), D: D-galactosamine + low dose of Dypsis lutescens extract group showing mild degeneration cells (star), dilated blood sinusoids (S) with activated kupffer cells (K) and pyknotic nuclei (P); E: D-galactosamine + high dose of Dypsis lutescens extract group showing restored hepatocytes architecture, with minimal dilated blood sinusoids (S) with activated kupffer cells (K) (H & E ×400).

Click here to view



  4. Discussion Top


Structural elucidation of compound 1 exhibited characteristic chromatographic behavior and UV spectral data of an apigenin di- C-glycoside[15]. 1H NMR spectrum showed two o-doublets at δ 7.93 and 6.91 ppm, assignable to H-2′/6′ and H-3’/5’, respectively, of ring B. The observation of a singlet at 6.59 ppm of H-3 alongside the absence of H-8 and H-6 resonances has led us to expect an apigenin 6, 8-di-C-glycoside structure. Two anomeric proton doublets at 4.76 and 4.88 were confirmative documents for two β-C-glycoside residues. Another evidence for the 6, 8-di-C-glycosidation was deduced from the typical downfield location of 13C-resonances of C-6 and C-8, and the intrinsic upfield location of C-1″ and C-1‴. Moreover, the total identity of 1 was proved by the positive HR-ESI-MS that showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 595.375 7 [M+H]+, corresponding to a MF of C27H30O15. According to the above discussed documents and comparison with the corresponding previous published data[16], the structure of 1 was finally confirmed as apigenin 6,8-di-C-β-D-4Crglucopyranoside (vicenin II), which was isolated for the first time from the genus Dypsis[4]. Compound 4 has shown some chromatographic and UV spectral properties of compound 1, referring to a tentative structure as an apigenin C-glycoside. In the aromatic region, its 1H NMR spectrum gave the same splitting pattern as in case of compound 1 except for the appearance of a singlet at δ 6.13 interpretable to H-6 to conclude a tentative structure as an apigenin 8-C-glycoside for compound 4. Furthermore, the characteristic downfield location of H-2″ in the aliphatic region at 4.64 ppm was indicative of the probability for acylation of OH-2″. The presence of a sulphate group on C-2″ was established by negative ESI-MS analysis that showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 511.1 [M-H] together with a fragment ion at 431.1 [M-H- 80], corresponding to the loss of sulphate group. Further confirmation for the structure of compound 4 was achieved from 13C NMR, which showed a remarkable downfield shift of C-2″ to 76.80 due to the effect of the presence of sulphate group at C-2″. Depending on the mentioned data and its comparison with the corresponding literature[17], compound 4 was established as vitexin 2″-O-sulfate (prechafuroside B). 1H and 13C NMR spectral data of compound 5 were similar to the corresponding ones of compound 1, except for the observation of a broad singlet at 4.91 along with a doublet at 0.96 that were intrinsic signals for the anomeric (H-1‴) and methyl protons (CH3-6‴), respectively, of an α -rhamnopyranosyl moiety. An additional evidence for the presence of a C-rhamnosyl moiety was deduced from 13C-resonance of CH3 at 19.40 ppm. Compound 5 was proved to be apigenin 6-C-β -D-4C1- glucopyranosyl-8-C-β-L-1C4-rhamnopyranoside (violanthin)[18]. The remaining compounds were identified using various spectroscopic tools of analysis and comparison of their data with the corresponding literature[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25].

In this study, D-GaIN caused significant damage to liver functions. Elevated levels of liver enzymes are considered as indicators of liver damage. It may be due to that D-GaIN injection affects plasma membrane permeability, and then causes release of liver enzymes inside the cell, which leads to the increase in serum enzymes levels[26],[27],[28]. Liver injury induced by D-GaIN administration is also due to the extreme formation of reactive hydroxyl radical (OH-), which is responsible for acute oxidative damage to the hepatic cells contents as lipids, proteins and DNA[29], and to the increased secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor- α and interkulin-1 α [26]. Our results showed significantly increased NO and MDA levels and significantly reduced PON1 level, in D-GaIN group compared to control group. In addition, D-GaIN group showed a significant increase in hyaluronic acid level, which indicated liver injury[30]. Remarkable relations between plasma hyaluronic acid levels and degree of hepatic damage have been found in cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease as well as chronic hepatitis C[31], and hyaluronic acid levels can be used to estimate liver function status. The significant increase of MMP1 in D-GaIN group was also observed. MMPs are important markers for diagnosis of inflammatory process and elevated MMP1 level indicates liver injury and inflammation. MMP1 is secreted by stromal and inflammatory cells, such as TNF- αa , transforming growth factor β and IL-1 α[32]. Infection followed by immoderate inflammation may cause tissue damage, and MMPs are implicated in immunopathological changes[33].

The decrease of MMP1 and hyaluronic acid levels in the treatment group indicated the ability of the high dose of D. lutescens to attenuate liver inflammation and injury. In the same line, the antioxidant properties of the Dypsis extract were observed in this study; thus, MDA and NO levels were significantly decreased in the treatment groups compared to D-GaIN group. Surprisingly, the antioxidant enzyme (PON1) was significantly increased only in the low dose of D. lutescens.

The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of D. lutescens help in maintaining liver health and functions as observed in our results. From the light of these results, we concluded that the hepatoprotective actions of D. lutescens may be attributed to a combination of different phytochemicals and bioactive constituents such as flavonoids, coumarins, sterols, terpenoids, quinones and alkaloids. These bioactive constituents are synergistic in their action, and such diversity of these compounds magnifies their biological properties. It is known that D-GaIN promoted the oxidative stress through induction of ROS generation[34],[35]. Besides, it consumed antioxidant compounds in the liver[36], and produced free radicals that induced LPO[37], which led to liver injury and elevation of all hepatic markers levels[38]. Various studies suggested that antioxidant effects of magniferin, flavonoids and lycopene reduced acute liver injury induced by D-GaIN[39],[40].

Our findings also showed that administration of D. lutescens suppressed the histopathological hepatic damage in the D-GalN group. These results were confirmed with the biochemical results. Therefore, it can be concluded that D. lutescens supplements can inhibit D-GaIN stimulated liver damage.

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Funding

The research fund for this work has been received from the National Research Centre, Egypt (project No. 11010325).

Authors’ contributions

MME and WAE were responsible for collection and extraction of the plant, and isolation of the compounds. Both MIN and TKM contributed in isolation of the compounds and interpretation of the spectroscopic data. EAO and AHF performed the histopathological studies. JH carried out the hepatoprotective, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory assays and wrote the biological part of the manuscript. MYE suggested the plan of work and contributed in writing the manuscript.



 
  References Top

1.
Abdel-Misih SRZ, Bloomston M. Liver anatomy. Surg Clin North Am 2010; 90: 643-653.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Jelkmann W. The role of the liver in the production of thrombopoietin compared with erythropoietin. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 13: 791-801.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Stickel F, Schuppan D. Herbal medicine in the treatment of liver diseases. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39: 293-304.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ibrahim H, Elshaarawy F, Haggag E. Investigation of Livistona decipiens leaf methanol extract and evaluation of antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities. J Adv Pharm Res 2018; 4(2): 256-268.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Christenhusz MJM, Byng JW. The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa 2016; 261(3): 201-217.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Article R, Chiduruppa M, Opera BM, Nadu T. A detailed review on Dypsis lutescens (Arecaceae). WJPPS 2018; 10(7): 1644-1650.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Lorke D. A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing. Arch Toxicol 1983; 54: 275-287.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Edris R. Analysis of antioxidants and serum biochemical responses in goldfish under nickel exposure by sub-chronic test. J Appl Anim Res 2017; 45(1): 320-325.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
El-Nahhal Y. Accidental zinc phosphide poisoning among population: A case report. ODEM 2018; 6: 37-49.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
King EJ, Woolton JDP. Micro analysis in medical bio-chemistry. Third edition. London: J and AChurchill LTD; 1956, p. 102.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Etim OE, Ekong MB, Bassey UE, Akpan EJ. Toxicological studies on albino Wistar rats co-treated with chloroquine phosphate and cefuroxime axetil. Pharmacologyonline 2016; 3: 127-132.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Ghosh A, Sherpa ML, Bhutia Y, Pal R, Dahal S. Serum nitric oxide status in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Sikkim. Int J App Basic Med Res 2011; 1: 31-35.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Yale BM, Yeldu MH. Serum nitric oxide and malondialdehyde in a hypertensive population in Sokoto, Nigeria. Int J Res Med Sci 2018; 6(12): 3929-3934.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gaidukov L, Tawfik DS. The development of human sera tests for HDL- bound serum PON1 and its lipolactonase activity. J Lipid Res 2007; 48(7): 1637-1646.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mabry TJ, Markham KR, Thomas MB. The systematic identification of flavonoids. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1970, p. 715.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Harborne JB, Mabry TJ. The flavonoids. Boston, MA: Springer; 1982, p. 505-534.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ishida H, Wakimoto T, Kitao Y, Tanaka S, Mlyase T, Nukaya H. Quantitation of chafurosides A and B in tea leaves and isolation of prechafurosides A and B from oolong tea leaves. J Agric Food Chem 2009; 57: 6779-6786.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Flamini G. Flavonoids and other compounds from the aerial parts of Viola etrusc. Chem Biodivers 2007; 4(2): 139-144.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Burns DC, Ellis DA, March RE. A predictive tool for assessing 13C NMR chemical shifts of flavonoids. Magn Reson Chem 2007; 45: 835-845.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Aboutabl EA, Ahmed RF, El-Kashak WA, Sleem AA, Elkhrisy EA, Nassar IM. Studies of phenolic constituents and biological activities of Livistona decipiens leaves (Fam. Arecaceae). Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 2018; 9(5): 2000-2014.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Elsawi SA, Aboutabl EA, Rashed KN, Ragab NA, Marzouk MM, Sleem AA. Phenolic investigation and potential therapeutiactivities of Alectryon tomentosus (F. Muell.) Radlk leaves family Sapindaceae. J Mater Environ Sci 2017; 8(5): 1518-1525.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Essa A, Mohamed T, Haggag E, Elkhrisy E. Flavonolignans and biological activity of Nannorrhops ritchiana leaves. J Adv Pharm Res 2017; 2(1): 44-55.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Grace MH, Warlick CW, Neff SA, Lila MA. Efficient preparative isolation and identification of walnut bioactive components using highspeed counter-current chromatography and LC-ESI-IT-TOF-MS. Food Chem 2014; 158: 229-238.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sai V, Chaturvedula P, Prakash I. Research article flavonoids from Astragalus propinquus. J Chem Pharm Res 2013; 5(1): 261-265.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Umur E. The isolation of carboxylic acids from the flowers of Delphinium formosum. Turk J Chem 2001; 25(1): 93-97.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Hussein J, El-matty DA, El-khayat Z. The protective effect of some polyphenolic compounds on lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatitis in D-galactosamine sensitized rats. J Med Plant Res 2011; 5(2): 191-199.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Gupta VK, Siddiqi NJ, Ojha AK, Sharma B. Hepatoprotective effect of Aloe vera against cartap- and malathion-induced toxicity in Wistar rats. J Cell Physiol 2019; 234(10): 18329-18343.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Jaiswal SK, Gupta VK, Ansari MD, Siddiqi NJ, Sharma B. Vitamin C acts as a hepatoprotectant in carbofuran treated rat liver slices in vitro. Toxicol Rep 2017; 9(4): 265-273.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
McKillop IH, Schrum LW. Alcohol and liver cancer. Alcohol 2005; 35: 195-203.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Engström-Laurent A, Lööf L, Nyberg A, Schröder T. Increased serum levels of hyaluronate in liver disease. Hepatology 1985; 5: 638-642.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Plevris JN, Haydon GH, Simpson KJ, Dawkes R, Ludlum CA, Harrison DJ, et al. Serum hyaluronan-a non-invasive test for diagnosing liver cirrhosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12: 1121-1127.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Unemori EN, Hibbs MS, Amento EP. Constitutive expression of a 92-kD gelatinase (type V collagenase ) by rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts and its induction in normal human fibroblasts by inflammatory cytokines. J Clin Invest 1991; 88(5): 1656-1662.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Elkington PTG, O’Kane CM, Friedland JS. The paradox of matrix metalloproteinases in infectious disease. Clin Exp Immunol 2005; 142: 12-20.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Kemelo MK, Horinek A, Farghali H. Comparative effects of quercetin and SRT1720 against D-galactosamine/ lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatotoxicity in rats: Biochemical and molecular biological investigations. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol 2016; 20(2): 363-371.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Zdanowski R, Gil J. D-Galactosamine intoxication in experimental animals: Is it only an experimental model of acute liver failure? Med Sci Monit 2015; 21: 1469-1477.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Choi JW, Kim YMIN, Lee MINK, Nam TJ. Pyropia yezoensis glycoprotein regulates antioxidant status and prevents hepatotoxicity in a rat model of D-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide-induced acute liver failure. Mol Med Rep 2016; 13(4): 3110-3114.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Jaiswal SK, Gupta VK, Siddiqi NJ, Pandey RS, Sharma B. Hepatoprotective effect of citrus limon fruit extract against carbofuran induced toxicity in Wistar rats. Chin J Biol 2015; 2015: 686071.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Kemelo MK, Wojnarová L, Canová NK, Farghali H. D-galactosamines/ lipopolysaccharide-induced hepatotoxicity downregulates sirtuin 1 in rat liver: Role of sirtuin 1 modulation in hepatoprotection. Physiol Res 2014; 63(5): 615-623.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Das J, Ghosh J, Roy A, Sil PC. Mangiferin exerts hepatoprotective activity against D-galactosamine induced acute toxicity and oxidative/ nitrosative stress via Nrf2-NF κ B pathways. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2012; 260(1): 35-47.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Dong M, Hong T, Liu S, Zhao J, Meng Y, Mu J. Hepatoprotective effect of the flavonoid fraction isolated from the flower of Inula britannica against D-galactosamine-induced hepatic injury. Mol Med Rep 2013; 7: 1919-1923.  Back to cited text no. 40
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  2. Materials and...
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1107    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded88    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal