• Users Online: 449
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
REVIEW
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 328-332

Probiotic based therapy for atopic dermatitis: Outcomes of clinical studies


Innovation Center for Holistic Health, Nutraceuticals, and Cosmeceuticals, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai-50200, Thailand

Date of Submission12-Jan-2018
Date of Decision08-May-2018
Date of Acceptance10-Jun-2018
Date of Web Publication28-Jun-2018

Correspondence Address:
Bhagavathi Sundaram Sivamaruthi
Bhagavathi Sundaram Sivamaruthi, Innovation Center for Holistic Health, Nutraceuticals, and Cosmeceuticals, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai
Thailand
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2221-1691.235328

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the chronic inflammatory skin diseases characterized by conflicts in epidermal barrier and wired immune response. About 10%-20% of the population is affected by AD, especially infants. Topical application of corticosteroids, antihistamines, and antibiotics are used to treat severe AD condition. Recent studies suggest that disturbance in skin and intestinal microbiota is majorly linked to skin diseases. Probiotics are known for the positive alteration of an individual's microbiome and associated with several health benefits. Clinical studies suggest that probiotic and synbiotic supplementation protect infants from a stringent AD to some extent. Reduction in the risk of AD development upon probiotic supplementation was not observed in all studied populations. Further studies are needed to regularize microbiome of skin and intestine in AD patients that may reduce AD severity. Present review summarizes the outcomes from clinical studies on AD using probiotic as an alternative treatment candidate.

Keywords: Probiotics, Atopic dermatitis, Eczema, Infants


How to cite this article:
Sivamaruthi BS, Kesika P, Chaiyasut C. Probiotic based therapy for atopic dermatitis: Outcomes of clinical studies. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2018;8:328-32

How to cite this URL:
Sivamaruthi BS, Kesika P, Chaiyasut C. Probiotic based therapy for atopic dermatitis: Outcomes of clinical studies. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 18];8:328-32. Available from: http://www.apjtb.org/text.asp?2018/8/6/328/235328

Foundation project: This work is supported by Chiang Mai University grant for Center of Excellency in Innovative Research on Holistic Health, Nutraceuticals, and Cosmeceuticals and the CMU Post-Doctoral Fellowship (Ref: No. 6592(11)/1379, dated 26 February 2018), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.





  1. Introduction Top


Skin is the principal organ of the human body, which consists of several layers such as skin surface, epidermis, and dermis, and acts as a physical barrier against toxic substances and invading microorganisms. The skin is also considered as an interface of the human system from the external environment[1]. The epidermal layer of the skin is prone to microbial infection, and the skin microbiome is also influenced by the integrity of the epidermal layer[2].

Skin diseases are the fourth leading cause of global disease burden. More than 3 000 skin diseases were recorded with the impact of environmental factors, aging, genetic factors, and skin damages. The economic burden of the skin diseases has been estimated among US population and found that about $75 billion was used for the treatment of skin related diseases. Nearly $887 have been spent by every affected individual for treating skin diseases in the US during 2013[3] .

The typical treatment strategies for the primary skin diseases are metronidazole[4], and antibiotics like tetracyclines for rosacea[5], and retinoids[6],[7], erythromycin, and clindamycin[8] for acne treatments. Atopic dermatitis (AD) cannot be controlled or treated with single treatment methods; it requires several clinical procedures to recover the affected individual. The use of effective moisturizer to reduce the dryness of the skin and topical corticosteroids to diminish the immune responses like inflammation is the prescribed first line treatment for AD[9].

Probiotics (live microbes that confer a health benefit on the host, when administered in adequate amounts) containing foods are considered as functional food, since they promote the health conditions by modulating host defense system, inhibiting the growth of invading microbial pathogens and secreting the bioactive principles such as short chain fatty acids, antioxidants, and vitamins[10]. The species of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus are frequently used as probiotics[11]. The beneficial effect of probiotic varies among the strains of same species[12], and the impact of probiotic also depends on the consumer's health conditions, gender, age and food habits[13].

It has been reported that the topical use of corticosteroids for the treatment of AD leads to skin atrophy and viral infection[14]. Alternative probiotic based therapies for AD have been reported in recent years with promising results. The present review focused on the clinical outcomes of probiotic-based treatment for AD.


  2. AD Top


AD or atopic eczema is a chronic medical condition that makes the skin inflamed, itchy, and flare frequently. The primary cause of AD is genetic and environmental factors. The children exposed to various antibiotics have disturbed gut microbiome, which facilitates the development of AD, and AD incidence is also closely associated with hygiene practices, the immune system of an individual, etc[l5]. Children with severe AD have a risk to develop asthma[16],[17],[18]. The AD is common in urban areas[15], and prevalence of AD is common in Western countries and now increasing in developing countries[19].

The major symptom of the illness is itching, which affects the quality of AD patient's life. Sweat, skin dryness, physical effort, and stress are the common factors that influence the severity of AD[20],[21]. The neck[20], legs and back were the itchiest parts of the body, and the pruritus was increased during night time. A clear mechanism behind the increased itching during night time is not yet revealed[20],[21]. The disturbed sleep and itchiness significantly affect the mental health and increase the stress in AD patients[22].

The skin microbiome is disturbed by endogenous factors and external factors like hygiene, use of skin care cosmetics, clothing, and contemporary treatments. A composed skin microflora is a defense measure against various skin infections[23]. About 90% of AD patient skin are residing with Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and 50% of these S. aureus are producing toxin[24]. Rubbing disrupts the skin barrier that enhances the attachment of S. aureus to the skin. S. aureus can induce flares, which facilitates the spreading of the lesional AD[25]. S. aureus can penetrate epidermis layer of the skin and disturb the barrier function by inducing keratinocyte endogenous serine protease production[26]. AD is considered as a risk factor for the methicillin-resistant S. aureus invasion and colonization[27]. The intestinal microbiome also influences the development of AD. The use of antibiotics disturbs or prevents the healthy development of intestinal microbiome in infants. For example, excess antibiotic use interrupts Escherichia coli colonization in the intestine that disturbs the protective measures against AD[28].

It is known that the disturbance in gut microbiome enables the development of AD, especially in children, along with genetic and environmental factors.


  3. Probiotic treatments for AD Top


The supplementation of Lactobacillus fermentum VRI-033 PCC for eight weeks significantly reduced the Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), and the severity of AD in infants of 6-18 months old[29]. The distinct intervention of Lactobacillus sakei KCTC 10755BP (2-10 years old children; 5 χ 109 CFU twice a day)[30], and Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP133 (1-13 years old children; 0.5 χ 1010 CFU per day)[31] for 12 weeks significantly reduced the SCORAD, disease activity, and improved the quality of children with atopic eczema- dermatitis syndrome[30],[31].

Two separate studies suggested that the synbiotic preparations can reduce the intensity of AD. The supplementation of Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1, Bifidobacterium lactis (B. lactis) UABLA-12, and fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS) to children (1-3 years old) showed the significant reduction in SCORAD (33.7%), Infant Dermatitis Quality of Life (33%), Dermatitis Family Impact (35.2%) scores. The lymphocyte subsets (CD22, CD3, and CD16) were not changed. Whereas CD4 and CD25 counts were decreased, and CD8 count was increased in the AD patients supplemented with symbiotic preparations[32]. The intervention of single strain of Lactobacillus salivarius (L. salivarius) along with FOS showed a reduction in the severity of AD, SCORAD, eosinophil cationic protein levels, and frequency of medication. The results suggested that the synbiotic supplementation was better than prebiotic treatment for infant AD[33].

The supplementation of proBiotik® pur (a mixture of L. salivarius, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidum) to 1-13 years old children showed the predominant reduction in SCORAD, IgE, IL-6, IL-5, and IFN- γ levels while TNF- α , IL-10, IL-2, and IL-4 levels were not affected. The results claimed that the proBiotik® pur was effective against AD[34]. Another report suggested that the intervention of Lactobacillus fermentum (2 χ 109 CFU) alone, Lactobacillus paracasei (2 × 109 CFU) alone, and a mix of both strain (4 × 109 CFU) for three months can reduce the SCORAD, Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index and Family Dermatology Life Quality Index scores, and urine 8-Oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine and eosinophilic protein X, serum IgE and TNF- α levels, thereby improving the clinical status of the AD[35].

Several scientific reports are available on the impact of supplementation of the probiotic formulation to pregnant women with high risk for infant AD. Pregnant women were supplemented with Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) GG (2 × 1010 CFU per day) for 2-4 weeks before the projected delivery date, and postnatally for six months to the mothers or their infants (same dose). The results showed that the intervention prevents the early atopic disease in their children. The incidence of atopic eczema was reduced during first two years of life, and the protective effect extended up to 4 years[36],[37].

L. rhamnosus GG ATCC53103 (2 x 1010 CFU per day) was supplemented to pregnant women prenatally for four weeks and postnatally, i.e., to a newborn baby, for six months. Then the protective effect of the probiotic intervention was assessed after 2, 4 and 7 years. Interestingly, the results suggested that the supplementation of L. rhamnosus GG protects the children from the risk of AD even for seven years[38].

Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC55 7 30 (1 x 108 CFU per day) was supplemented to pregnant women from 36 week until delivery; then the infants were supplemented with same strain (same dose) for 12 months and follow-up study was carried out for one more year. The results suggested that the intervention reduced the risk of development of respiratory allergic disease at a later period of life[39]. Ecologic® Panda (Lactococcus lactis, B. lactis, and Bifidobacterium bifidum; 1 x 109 CFU of each strain per day) was supplemented to pregnant women from 6 weeks before delivery, continued another 12 months intervention to infants. The clinical assessments recommended that the supplementation of Ecologic® Panda prevents the incidence of eczema in infants up to 2 years[40]. Three subsequent studies with probiotic strains (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis HN019; 9 x 109 CFU per day or L. rhamnosus HN001; 6 x 109 CFU per day) on pregnant women and their infants revealed that L. rhamnosus HN001 supplementation reduces the SCORAD and incidence of eczema, and also significantly diminishes the risk of infant eczema[41],[42] up to the age of six[43].

A mixture of probiotic formula that consisted of B. lactis Bb12, and L. rhamnosus GG ATCC53103 at the concentration of each 1 x 1010 CFU per day was given to the pregnant women (atopic mothers) from the 1st trimester of pregnancy to the end of exclusive breastfeeding. The probiotic intervention protected the sensitization in high-risk infants effectively compared to placebo control[44]. Another study was conducted with two sets of probiotic formulations (Bifidobacterium longum BL999 and L. rhamnosus LPR, each 1 x 109 CFU per day; Bifidobacterium longum BL999 and Lactobacillus paracasei ST11, each 1 x 109 CFU per day). The probiotic supplements were given to pregnant women during two months before the delivery and another two months after giving birth. The clinical parameters were evaluated at postnatal 6, 12, and 24 months. The results revealed that both combinations of probiotic interventions were safe and reduced the risk of eczema development in infants[45].

AD is most common among the infants, but some of the adult AD incidences are recorded, and some of the probiotic based clinical trails were conducted in adults. The separate supplementation of L. salivarius LS01 (2 x 109 CFU per day) to 18-46 years old adults (AD patients) for sixteen weeks improved the Dermatology Life Quality Index score, reduced the SCORAD index and Staphylococci load. L. salivarius LS01 supplementation modulated the Thl/Th2 cytokine profiles. Moreover, L. salivarius LS01 supplementation reduced the Th2 cytokines production while the Th1 production level was maintained[46],[47]. The intervention of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp lactis LKM512 (6 x 109 CFU) along with dextrin, glucose, silicon dioxide, inulin, and skim milk reduced the itching and increased kynurenic acid levels in AD patients. The study claimed that LKM512 supplementation induces the antipruritic effects by accelerating the kynurenic acid production. LKM512 could be a potent therapeutic agent for pruritus[48].

However, not all the probiotic formulations and intervention studies are successful regarding health benefits to human subjects. For example, the supplementation of synbiotic formulation that contains seven probiotic strains and FOS to infants (1-36 months old)[49], and the intervention of Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-2116 or B. lactis CNCM I-3446 to 3-6 months old infants[50] showed no statistical significance in SCORAD scores and other assessed parameters between treated and placebo groups[49],[50]. Infants (postnatal period: 48 h) were supplemented with Lactobacillus acidophilus LAVRI-A1 (3 x 109 CFU per day for six months) in maltodextrin and found that the intervention does not prevent the development of AD, significantly[51]. Some of the studies suggested that the supplementation of L. rhamnosus GG at different concentrations to infants does not have protective effects against AD[52],[53] while supplementation (for four weeks) of L. rhamnosus GG (5 x 109 CFU) showed a reduction in SCORAD score, and the symptoms of AD syndrome in IgE-sensitized infants[54]. Whereas, the cocktail of a probiotic mixture containing L. rhamnosus GG, Propionibacterium freudenreichii ssp. shermanii JS, Bifidobacterium breve, and L. rhamnosus LC705 along with galactooligosaccharides displayed no impact on the incidence of allergic diseases[55],[56], and no allergy- preventive effect[56], but reduced atopic eczema[55] in infants at high risk for allergy.


  4. Conclusion Top


Latest studies have attempted to explain the role of intestinal microbiome and skin in the risk of development of AD. But most of the information is from infants, and the data from the adult AD is limited. It is known that the probiotic supplementation alters the microbiome of an individual. Thus, several clinical studies were conducted to explore the therapeutic property of probiotic formulations against AD. Some of the studies showed positive results and others demonstrated no effect. A particular probiotic strain exhibits the protective act on AD in some group of the population that may not work on another study group. Multi-strain formulations and synbiotic preparations showed better protection from allergic diseases than single-strain or prebiotic interventions. To explain the link between the microbiome and AD development, and the prevention measures for AD via probiotic supplementation, further intensive study is required in this field.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Authors gratefully acknowledge the support from Chiang Mai University grant for Center of Excellency in Innovative Research on Holistic Health, Nutraceuticals, and Cosmeceuticals. Bhagavathi Sundaram Sivamaruthi wish to acknowledge the CMU Post-Doctoral Fellowship (Ref: No. 6592(11)/1379, dated 26 February 2018), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.



 
  References Top

1.
Grice EA, Segre JA. The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9(4): 244-253.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Sanford JA, Gallo RL. Functions of the skin microbiota in health and disease. Semin Immunol 2013; 25: 370-377.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lim HW, Collins SAB, Resneck JS Jr, Bolognia JL, Hodge JA, Rohrer TA, et al. The burden of skin disease in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017; 76(5): 958-972.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Narayanan S, Hunerbein A, Getie M, Jackel A, Neubert RH. Scavenging properties of metronidazole on free oxygen radicals in a skin lipid model system. J Pharm. Pharmacol 2007; 59(8): 1125-1130.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Sloan B, Scheinfeld N. The use and safety of doxycycline hyclate and other second-generation tetracyclines. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2008; 7(5): 571-577.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Gollnick H, Cunliffe W, Berson D, Dreno B, Finlay A, Leyden JJ, et al. Management of acne: A report from a Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49(1): S1-S37.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Strauss JS, Krowchuk DP, Leyden JJ, Lucky AW, Shalita AR, Siegfried EC, et al. Guidelines of care for acne vulgaris management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007; 56(4): 651-663.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Tan HH. Topical antibacterial treatments for acne vulgaris: Comparative review and guide to selection. Am J Clin Dermatol 2004; 5(2): 79-84.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Leung DY. Atopic dermatitis: New insights and opportunities for therapeutic intervention. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000; 105(5): 860-876.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lin CS, Chang CJ, Lu CC, Martel J, Ojcius DM, Ko YF, et al. Impact of the gut microbiota, prebiotics, and probiotics on human health and disease. Biomed J 2014; 37(5): 259-268.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
de Vrese M, Schrezenmeir J. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2008; 111: 1-66.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Herbel SR, Vahjen W, Wieler LH, Guenther S. Timely approaches to identify probiotic species of the genus Lactobacillus. Gut Pathog 2013; 5(1): 27.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
O'Flaherty S, Saulnier DM, Pot B, Versalovic J. How can probiotics and prebiotics impact mucosal immunity? Gut Microbes 2010; 1(5): 293-300.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Berke R, Singh A, Guralnick M. Atopic dermatitis: An overview. Am Fam Physician 2012; 86(1): 35-42.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Flohr C, Pascoe D, Williams HC. Atopic dermatitis and the 'hygiene hypothesis': Too clean to be true? Br J Dermatol 2005; 152(2): 202-216.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
van der Hulst AE, Klip H, Brand PL. Risk of developing asthma in young children with atopic eczema: A systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120(3): 565-569.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Bingefors K, Svensson A, Isacson D, Lindberg M. Self-reported lifetime prevalence of atopic dermatitis and co-morbidity with asthma and eczema in adulthood: A population-based cross-sectional survey. Acta Derm Venereol 2013; 93(4): 438-441.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Thomsen SF. Epidemiology and natural history of atopic diseases. Eur Clin Respir J 2015; 2: 1-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Williams H, Stewart A, von Mutius E, Cookson W, Anderson HR. International Study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC) phase one and three study groups. Is eczema really on the increase worldwide? J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121(4): 947-954.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Yosipovitch G, Goon A, Wee J, Chan YH, Goh CL. The prevalence and clinical characteristics of pruritus among patients with extensive psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 2000; 143(5): 969-973.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Yosipovitch G, Goon ATJ, Wee J, Chan YH, Zucker I, Goh CL. Itch characteristics in Chinese patients with atopic dermatitis using a new questionnaire for the assessment of pruritus. Int J Dermatol 2002; 41(4): 212-216.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Buske-Kirschbaum A, Gierens A, Hollig H, Hellhammer DH. Stress- induced immunomodulation is altered in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Neuroimmunol 2002; 129(1): 161-167.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Zeeuwen PL, Boekhorst J, van den Bogaard EH, de Koning HD, van de Kerkhof PM, Saulnier DM, et al. Microbiome dynamics of human epidermis following skin barrier disruption. Genome Biol 2012; 13(11): R101. Doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-11-r101.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Park KD, Pak SC, Park KK. The pathogenetic effect of natural and bacterial toxins on atopic dermatitis. Toxins (Basel) 2016; 9(1): E3. Doi: 10.3390/toxins9010003.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Jun SH, Lee JH, Kim SI, Choi CW, Park TI, Jung HR, et al. Staphylococcus aureus-derived membrane vesicles exacerbate skin inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Allergy 2017; 47(1): 85-96.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Williams MR, Nakatsuji T, Sanford JA, Vrbanac AF, Gallo RL. Staphylococcus aureus induces increased serine protease activity in keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2017; 137(2): 377-384.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Daeschlein G, von Podewils S, Bloom T, Assadian O, Napp M, Haase H, et al. Risk factors for MRSA colonization in dermatologic patients in Germany. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2015; 13(10): 1015-1022.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Orivuori L, Mustonen K, de Goffau MC, Hakala S, Paasela M, Roduit C, et al. High level of fecal calprotectin at age 2 months as a marker of intestinal inflammation predicts atopic dermatitis and asthma by age 6. Clin Exp Allergy 2015; 45(5): 928-939.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Weston S, Halbert A, Richmond P, Prescott SL. Effects of probiotics on atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90(9): 892-897.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Woo SI, Kim JY, Lee YJ, Kim NS, Hahn YS. Effect of Lactobacillus sakei supplementation in children with atopic eczema-dermatitis syndrome. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2010; 104(4): 343-348.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Han Y, Kim B, Ban J, Lee J, Kim BJ, Choi BS, et al. A randomized trial of Lactobacillus plantarum CJLP133 for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2012; 23(7): 667-673.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Gerasimov SV, Vasjuta VV, Myhovych OO, Bondarchuk LI. Probiotic supplement reduces atopic dermatitis in preschool children: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Am J Clin Dermatol 2010; 11(5): 351-361.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Wu KG, Li TH, Peng HJ. Lactobacillus salivarius plus fructo- oligosaccharide is superior to fructo-oligosaccharide alone for treating children with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: A double-blind, randomized, clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166(1): 129-136.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Yesilova Y, Calka O, Akdeniz N, Berkta M. Effect of probiotics on the treatment of children with atopic dermatitis. Ann Dermatol 2012; 24(2): 189-193.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Wang IJ, Wang JY. Children with atopic dermatitis show clinical improvement after Lactobacillus exposure. Clin Exp Allergy 2015; 45(4): 779-787.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Kalliomaki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, Kero P, Koskinen P, Isolauri E. Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 357(9262): 1076-1079.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Kalliomaki M1, Salminen S, Poussa T, Arvilommi H, Isolauri E. Probiotics and prevention of atopic disease: 4-year follow-up of a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361(9372): 1869-1871.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Kalliomaki M, Salminen S, Poussa T, Isolauri E. Probiotics during the first 7 years of life: A cumulative risk reduction of eczema in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 119(4): 1019-1021.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Abrahamsson TR, Jakobsson T, Bottcher MF, Fredrikson M, Jenmalm MC, Bjorksten B, et al. Probiotics in prevention of IgE-associated eczema: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 119(5): 1174-1180.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Niers L, Martin R, Rijkers G, Sengers F, Timmerman H, van Uden N, et al. The effects of selected probiotic strains on the development of eczema (the PandA study). Allergy 2009; 64(9): 1349-1358.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Wickens K, Black PN, Stanley TV, Mitchell E, Fitzharris P, Tannock GW, et al. A differential effect of 2 probiotics in the prevention of eczema and atopy: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 122(4): 788-794.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Wickens K, Black P, Stanley TV, Mitchell E, Barthow C, Fitzharris P, et al. A protective effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 against eczema in the first 2 years of life persists to age 4 years. Clin Exp Allergy 2012; 42(7): 1071-1079.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Wickens K, Stanley TV, Mitchell EA, Barthow C, Fitzharris P, Purdie G, et al. Early supplementation with Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 reduces eczema prevalence to 6 years: Does it also reduce atopic sensitization? Clin Exp Allergy 2013; 43(9): 1048-1057.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Huurre A, Laitinen K, Rautava S, Korkeamaki M, Isolauri E. Impact of maternal atopy and probiotic supplementation during pregnancy on infant sensitization: A double-blind placebo-controlled study. Clin Exp Allergy 2008; 38(8): 1342-1348.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Rautava S, Kainonen E, Salminen S, Isolauri E. Maternal probiotic supplementation during pregnancy and breast-feeding reduces the risk of eczema in the infant. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 130(6): 1355-1360.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Drago L, Iemoli E, Rodighiero V, Nicola L, De Vecchi E, Piconi S. Effects of Lactobacillus salivarius LS01 (DSM 22775) treatment on adult atopic dermatitis: A randomized placebo-controlled study. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2011; 24(4): 1037-1048.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Drago L, Toscano M, De Vecchi E, Piconi S, Iemoli E. Changing of fecal flora and clinical effect of L. salivarius LS01 in adults with atopic dermatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: S56-S63.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Matsumoto M, Ebata T, Hirooka J, Hosoya R, Inoue N, Itami S, et al. Antipruritic effects of the probiotic strain LKM512 in adults with atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2014; 113(2): 209-216.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Shafiei A, Moin M, Pourpak Z, Gharagozlou M, Aghamohammadi A, Sajedi V, et al. Synbiotics could not reduce the scoring of childhood atopic dermatitis (SCORAD): A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 10(1): 21-28.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Gore C, Custovic A, Tannock GW, Munro K, Kerry G, Johnson K, et al. Treatment and secondary prevention effects of the probiotics Lactobacillus paracasei or Bifidobacterium lactis on early infant eczema: Randomized controlled trial with follow-up until age 3 years. Clin Exp Allergy 2012; 42(1): 112-122.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Taylor AL, Dunstan JA, Prescott SL. Probiotic supplementation for the first 6 months of life fails to reduce the risk of atopic dermatitis and increases the risk of allergen sensitization in high-risk children: A randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 119(1): 184191.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Folster-Holst R, Muller F, Schnopp N, Abeck D, Kreiselmaier I, Lenz T, et al. Prospective, randomized controlled trial on Lactobacillus rhamnosus in infants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2006; 155(6): 1256-1261.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Gruber C, Wendt M, Sulser C, Lau S, Kulig M, Wahn U, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as treatment of atopic dermatitis in infancy. Allergy 2007 ; 62(11): 12701276.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Viljanen M, Savilahti E, Haahtela T, Juntunen-Backman K, Korpela R, Poussa T, et al. Probiotics in the treatment of atopic eczema/dermatitis syndrome in infants: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Allergy 2005; 60(4): 494-500.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Kukkonen K, Savilahti E, Haahtela T, Juntunen-Backman K, Korpela R, Poussa T, et al. Probiotics and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides in the prevention of allergic diseases: A randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 119(1): 192-198.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Kuitunen M, Kukkonen K, Juntunen-Backman K, Korpela R, Poussa T, Tuure T, et al. Probiotics prevent IgE-associated allergy until age 5 years in cesarean-delivered children but not in the total cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 123(2): 335-341.  Back to cited text no. 56
    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  3. Probiotic tre...
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. AD
4. Conclusion
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed328    
    Printed7    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded78    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal