|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 31-36
Larvicidal activity of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus
Apichat Vitta1, Punnawat Thimpoo2, Wipanee Meesil2, Thatcha Yimthin3, Chamaiporn Fukruksa2, Raxsina Polseela1, Bandid Mangkit4, Sarunporn Tandhavanant3, Aunchalee Thanwisai1
1 Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University; Centre of Excellence in Medical Biotechnology, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
2 Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
4 Department of Veterinary Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
|Date of Submission||01-Oct-2017|
|Date of Decision||05-Nov-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||02-Dec-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||22-Dec-2017|
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of symbiotic bacteria, Xenorhabdus indica, Xenorhabdus stockiae, Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. akhurstii and Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. hainanensis as a larvicide against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Methods: Larvae (L3-L4) of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus were given 2 mL of a suspension 107-108 CFU/mL of each symbiotic bacterium. Distilled water and Escherichia coli ATCC® 25922 were used as the control. The mortality rate of the larval mosquitoes was observed at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. The experiment was performed in triplicates. Results: The larvae of both Aedes species started to die at 24 h exposure. Aedes aegypti showed the highest mortality rate (87%-99%), 96 h after exposure to Xenorhabdus stockiae (bNBP22.2_TH). The mortality rate of Aedes albopictus was between 82% and 96% at 96 h after exposure to Xenorhabdus indica (bKK26.2_TH). Low effectiveness of distilled water and Escherichia coli ATCC® 25922 were observed in both Aedes larvae, with a mortality rate of 2% to 12%. Conclusions: The study confirms the oral toxicity of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria against Aedes spp. Xenorhabdus stockiae and Xenorhabdus indica may be an alternative agent for control Aedes spp. This is basic information for further study on the mechanism of action on Aedes larvae or application to control mosquito larvae in the community.
Keywords: Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Photorhabdus, Xenorhabdus, Larvicidal activity
|How to cite this article:|
Vitta A, Thimpoo P, Meesil W, Yimthin T, Fukruksa C, Polseela R, Mangkit B, Tandhavanant S, Thanwisai A. Larvicidal activity of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2018;8:31-6
|How to cite this URL:|
Vitta A, Thimpoo P, Meesil W, Yimthin T, Fukruksa C, Polseela R, Mangkit B, Tandhavanant S, Thanwisai A. Larvicidal activity of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 May 25];8:31-6. Available from: http://www.apjtb.org/text.asp?2018/8/1/31/221134
Foundation project: This study was supported by Higher Education Research
Promotion, The Commission on Higher Education, Thailand (Grant No. R2558A008) and Naresuan University (Grant No. R2557B013).
| 1. Introduction|| |
Aedes mosquitoes are the main vectors of West Nile, chikungunya, and dengue viruses,. Recently the zika virus, with devastating effects, particularly for pregnant women, was proven to be transmitted to humans by Aedes. Aedes aegypti (Ae. aegypti) and Aedes albopictus (Ae. albopictus) are the main vectors of the dengue virus, causing dengue fever which has affected over 390 million people living in more than 100 countries,. At present, there are no specific treatments or vaccines for these viruses, and the best approach to prevent infection is avoidance of mosquito bites. Therefore, control adult and larval Aedes is an important measure to prevent the viral infection to human. Control methods for adult and larval Aedes spp. have been categorized as environmental, mechanical, chemical, genetic and biological controls. Elimination of breeding sites of Aedes is a simple method and low cost to reduce the number of mosquitoes. Chemical controls (organochlorides, DDT; organophosphates, OP; pyrethroids) are the first method using in mosquito control. However, repeated use of these insecticides leads to development of insecticidal resistant mosquitoes and toxic to human. Aedes have been reported to be resistant to DDT in worldwide. In addition, mosquitoes in several countries in Asia have been developed to resist pyrethroid. Genetic control of Aedes (the sterile insect technique; rearing of insects carrying a dominant lethal allele) is a species specific method and most are in the laboratory conditions,. The genetic control methods need more consideration in cost, natural condition and environmental risk assessment. Control of larval mosquitoes is of low cost and can scope the certain source. Therefore, biological control of larval stage of Aedes is considered to be a potential measure to reduce number of mosquitoes leading to prevention and control of viral infection.
Biological control for Aedes spp. using protozoa, copepods,,, plant extracts,,, fungi, bacteria and their toxins,,, are promoted as being ecologically friendly, which is important for human life. Bacillus thuringiensis sis (B. thuringiensis), entomopathogenic bacteria have potential for biological control of Aedes spp.,. This bacterium shows rapid killing of the mosquito larvae and has no cross-resistant with chemical insecticides. However, Aedes spp. can develop moderate resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis) . Other bacteria commonly used for control of insects are Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus which are symbiotically associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. These bacteria have also been reported to have oral lethality to Ae. aegypti larvae,.
Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus are symbiotically associated with entomopathogenic nematodes which are Gram negative bacteria with the rod shape and peritichous flagella of the family Enterobacteriaceae. These bacteria produce several bioactive compounds with cytotoxic, antifungal, antibacterial, antiparasitic and insecticidal activities,,,,,,. Isopropylstilbene and ethylstilbene produced by Photorhabdus, and xenorhabdin and xenematide produced by Xenorhabdus, have also shown insecticidal activity. Cell suspensions of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus and their toxins were lethal to Aedes larvae, and a previous study showed that Photorhabdus insect-related protein from Photorhabdus asymbiotica had strong toxicity to Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. More recently, suspensions of Photorhabdus luminescens . luminescens) and Xenorhabdus nematophila X. nematophila) were shown to kill between 42% and 83% of Ae. aegypti larvae in laboratory conditions. In addition, P. luminescens and X. nematophila suspension mixed with Cry4Ba protein from B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis produced a mortality rate up to 87% and 95% of Ae. aegypti. These results suggest that Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus spp. may be effective alternative agents for the biological control of mosquitoes. Some 30 species of these bacteria have been reported worldwide,,,, but few species of these symbiotic bacteria have been tested to determine their efficacy in killing mosquito larvae. Xenorhabdus stockiae (X. stockiae) and Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. akhurstii (P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii), the majority species found in Thailand, and Xenorhabdus indica (X. indica), and Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. hainanensis (P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis), also found in Thailand suggested that these may be biological agents for controlling mosquito larvae, but the insecticidal or larvicidal activity of these symbiotic bacteria have never been tested against Aedes larvae. During the survey of entomopathogenic nematodes and symbiotic bacteria in northeast of Thailand, we identified several isolates of these symbiotic bacteria including X. stockiae, X. indica, P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of X. stockiae, X. indica, P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis isolated from entomopathogenic nematodes in Thailand against Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus larvae.
| 2. Materials and methods|| |
2.1. Bacterial isolates
Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus were isolated from entomopathogenic nematodes collected from soil samples from northeast of Thailand. These bacteria were previously identified by the sequencing of a partial region of the recA gene. To identify Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus into species level, BLASTN analysis of the 588 bp recA gene was performed with cut-off at 97% identity. Two species of Xenorhabdus were identified as X. stockiae isolate bNBP22.2_TH (Accession No. KY809323) and X. indica isolate bKK26.2_TH (Accession No. KY809302). Two subspecies of Photorhabdus were identified as P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii isolate bMSK25.5_TH (Accession No. KY809375) and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis isolate bKK17.1_TH (Accession No. KY809363). These four entomopathogenic bacteria were used in bioassays.
2.2. Preparation of bacterial cell suspension
Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus in LB broth with 20% glycerol were kept at -80 °C in our laboratory. Each bacterial isolate was grown on NBTA agar for 4 d and incubated at room temperature. To prepare a starter, a single colony was sub-cultured into 5 mL of 5YS medium containing 5% yeast extract (w/v), 0.5% NaCl (w/v), 0.05% K2HPO4 (w/v), 0.05% NH2H2PO4 (w/v), and 0.02% MgSO4•7H2O (w/v). The tube was then incubated in the dark for 24 h with shaking at 160 rpm. One mL of the starter was transferred into a 50 mL tube containing 39 mL of 5YS medium. The tubes were then incubated in the dark for 24 h with shaking at 160 rpm.
Escherichia More Details coli (E. coli) ATCC® 25922 that is used as the negative control was cultured on tryptone soy agar. The culturing process for the E. coli ATCC® 25922 was performed similarly to the preparation of the Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria.
To prepare bacterial cell suspension, the overnight cultures of Xenorhabdus, Photorhabdus and E. coli ATCC® 25922 were then centrifuged at 10 000 rpm at room temperature for 20 min. The supernatants were discharged. The bacterial pellets were resuspended with sterile distilled water. The turbidity of bacterial suspension was adjusted to 1.0 with sterile distilled water at OD600 nm by spectrophotometer. These bacterial suspensions were ready for using in bioassays.
2.3. Mosquito strains
Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus eggs were purchased from the Taxonomy and Reference Museum of the Department of Medical Sciences at the National Institute of Health of Thailand, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand. The filter papers containing the dried eggs of each Aedes species were placed in separate plastic containers containing dechlorinated water to allow the Aedes larvae to hatch. Larvae at the late third and early fourth instar were then selected out and feed with minced pet food.
Four different isolates of symbiotic bacteria (X. stockiae bNBP22.2_ TH, X. indica bKK26.2_TH, P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii bMSK25.5_TH and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis bKK17.1_TH) were tested as a larvicide against Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. The efficacy of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus suspensions against late third to fourth early instar larvae of both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus was evaluated under laboratory conditions. In each bioassay, ten larvae were placed in 100 μL of water in a well in a 24-well plate (COSTAR®, USA). Two mL of each bacterial suspension (107-108 CFU/mL) was added to the well. Distilled water and suspension of E. coli ATCC® 25922 were used as the negative control. The bioassay was designed to test two groups, the ‘fed group’ which was Aedes larvae fed with minced pet food during exposure to bacterial suspension and the ‘unfed group’ which was not fed during the experiment. All bioassays were conducted in triplicate on different dates. The mortality of the Aedes larvae was monitored at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h exposure to the bacterial suspensions. The dead larvae were determined when no movement was detected when teasing with fine sterile toothpick.
2.5. Data analysis
Mortality of Aedes larvae after exposure to the bacteria suspension with the comparison with the control groups was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test using SPSS version 17.0. P-value < 0.05 was considered as significant differences. The mortality of the Aedes larvae from both the fed and unfed groups was statistically analyzed by Mann-Whitney test.
| 3. Result|| |
Both Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus (late 3rd to early 4th instars larvae) were susceptible to all isolates of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria. The mortality of the larvae began to die at 24 h after exposure to the bacterial suspension. In the fed group, a cell suspension of X. stockiae (bNBP22.2_TH) demonstrated the highest toxicity to Ae. aegypti larvae (99% mortality) at 72 h after exposure. In the unfed group, X. stockiae (bNBP22.2_TH) showed the highest pathogenic effect on Ae. aegypti larvae, with 87% mortality at 96 h after exposure. Significant mortality among all bacterial isolates and negative controls (distilled water and E. coli ATCC® 25922) was observed at each time in the unfed group, although at a low rate of mortality [Table 1]. However, the mortality rate of both the fed and unfed groups by Ae. aegypti was not significantly different among the four bacterial isolates.
|Table 1: Mortality rate of Ae. aegypti larvae after exposure to cell suspension of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus in fed and unfed conditions in laboratory.|
Click here to view
[Table 2] shows the mortality rate of Ae. albopictus larvae after exposure to cell suspension of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus. X. indica (bKK26.2_TH) was highest toxic to Ae. albopictus at 96 h in both fed (82%) and unfed (96%) condition. This bacterial isolate seemed to be fast pathogens to Ae. albopictus having kill 84% of 24 h. Mortality rate at each time among bacterial isolates and controls was significantly different in both fed and unfed conditions.
|Table 2: Mortality rate of Ae. albopictus larvae after exposure to cell suspension of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus in fed and unfed conditions in laboratory.|
Click here to view
Mortality rate of Ae. aegypti at each time between fed and unfed groups was not significant different. Significant mortality between fed and unfed groups of Ae. albopictus larvae after exposure to X. indica (bKK26.2_TH) and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis (bKK17.1_TH) was observed at 24 h.
| 4. Discussion|| |
In the present study, we demonstrate the alternative bacterial agent for control Aedes spp., a main vector for important virus infection in man. Both Aedes spp. are susceptible to X. stockiae (bNBP22.2_ TH) X. indica (bKK26.2_TH) P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii (bMSK25.5_TH) and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis (bKK17.1_ TH). It seems that the symbiotic bacteria of genus Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus cause superior mortality of Aedes. X. stockiae, a symbiotic bacterium that is found to be associated with Steinernema websteri, have been used for acaricidal and antibacterial activity,. X. indica produces several bioactive compounds including taxlllaids A-G which has weakly effect on Plasmodium falciparum. In addition, metalloprotease purified from X. indica showed insecticidal activity against Helicoverpa armigera. P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis showed less effective against Aedes aegypti. To our knowledge, it is reported for the first time that four symbiotic bacteria [P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii (bMSK25.5_TH), P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis (bKK17.1_TH), X. stockiae (bNBP22.2_TH) and X. indica (bKK26.2_TH) in the present study are symbiotic bacteria for oral pathogenicity against Ae. albopictus.
Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, both serious transmitting vectors of West Nile, chikungunya, dengue and zika viruses to humans, are globally distributed,. Although several control methods against these vectors have been attempted to stop the transmission of viral infections, the numbers of human case has not declined, especially dengue infection. Biological controls of the vectors are an alternative measure to reduce human-mosquito contact. Our study demonstrated larvicidal activity of X. stockiae (bNBP22.2_TH), X. indica (bKK26.2_TH), P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii (bMSK25.5_ TH) and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis (bKK17.1_TH) against Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. Both vectors were susceptible to Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria by oral ingestion. This may be due to the bacteria producing insecticidal compounds including isopropylstilbene, ethylstilbene, xenorhabdin and xenematide. To support this scenario, Photorhabdus insect-related protein from Photorhabdus asymbiotica showed strong toxicity to Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. In addition, a suspension of Photorhabdus luminescens subsp. laumondii TT01 DSM15139 and X. nematophila ATCC® 19061 showed orally lethality to Ae. aegypti larvae in laboratory conditions. P. luminescens and X. nematophila suspension mixed with Cry4Ba protein from B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis enhanced the mortality rate of Ae. aegypti up to 87% and 95%, respectively. Recently, X. nematophila mixed with B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis was observed to enhance the toxicity to Ae. albopictus and Culex pipiens pallens. In addition, Xenorhabdus ehlersii isolated from Steinernema scarabaei showed good potential efficacy in killing Ae. aegypti with 100% mortality. In our study, we confirmed the oral toxicity of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus against Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus. However, it remains unknown as to the mechanism of killing effect of these bacteria on Aedes spp.
Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus have orally toxicity to Aedes spp., but mortality rates vary. It is possible that the different pathogenicity from each bacterial species or isolates produces different amounts and kinds of bioactive compounds. Phurealipid derivatives, the inhibitor of juvenile hormone epoxide hydrolase in insects, were produced by different isolates of P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii,. In addition, the virulence of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus varied among insect species is related to foraging behavior. This suggests that the virulent factors of Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus require further study for more deeply understanding.
We demonstrate the potential of entomopathogenic bacteria, X. stockiae, X. indica, P. luminescens subsp. akhurstii and P. luminescens subsp. hainanensis, for the control of arbovirus vectors, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, by oral ingestion. This study confirms that Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus have orally toxicity against Aedes larvae and provides further information relevant to the biological control of mosquito larvae. Further studies on identification and isolation of purified useful bioactive compounds to control both larval and adult mosquitoes, and their mechanisms of killing mosquitoes, are suggested.
Conflict of interest statement
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
This study was supported by Higher Education Research Promotion, The Commission on Higher Education, Thailand (Grant No. R2558A008) and Naresuan University (Grant No. R2557B013). We would like to thank Miss Chutima Sarai and Miss Ponsuwan Aeiwong for their assistance with the laboratory technique. Many thanks were extended to Mr. Roy Morien of the Naresuan University Language Centre for his editing assistance and advice on English expression in this document.
| References|| |
Benelli G, Mehlhorn H. Declining malaria, rising of dengue and Zika virus: insights for mosquito vector control. Parasitol Res
Gebre Y, Forbes N, Gebre T. Zika virus infection, transmission, associated neurological disorders and birth abnormalities: A review of progress in research, priorities and knowledge gaps. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed
Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature
Baldacchino F, Caputo B, Chandre F, Drago A, della Torre A, Montarsi F, et al. Control methods against invasive Aedes
mosquitoes in Europe: a review. Pest Manag Sci
Naqqash MN, Gokce A, Bakhsh A, Salim M. Insecticide resistance and its molecular basis in urban insect pests. Parasitol Res
Bellini R, Medici A, Puggioli A, Balestrino F, Carrieri M. Pilot field trials with Aedes albopictus
irradiated sterile males in Italian urban areas. J Med Entomol
Winskill P, Harris AF, Morgan SA, Stevenson J, Raduan N, Alphey L, et al. Genetic control of Aedes aegypti:
data-driven modelling to assess the effect of releasing different life stages and the potential for long-term suppression. Parasit Vectors
Otta DA, Rott MB, Carlesso AM, da Silva OS. Prevalence of Acanthamoeba
spp. (Sarcomastigophora: Acanthamoebidae) in wild populations of Aedes aegypti
(Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res
Russell BM, Muir LE, Weinstein P, Kay BH. Surveillance of the mosquito Aedes aegypti
and its biocontrol with the copepod Mesocyclops aspericornis
in Australian wells and gold mines. Med Vet Entomol
Mahesh Kumar P, Murugan K, Kovendan K, Panneerselvam C, Prasanna Kumar K, Amerasan D, et al. Mosquitocidal activity of Solanum xanthocarpum
fruit extract andcopepod Mesocyclops thermocyclopoides
for the control of dengue vector Aedes aegypti. Parasitol Res
Veronesi R, Carrieri M, Maccagnani B, Maini S, Bellini R. Macrocyclops albidus
(Copepoda: cyclopidae) for the biocontrol of Aedes albopictus
and Culex pipiens
in Italy. J Am Mosq Control Assoc
Zuharah WF, Ahbirami R, Dieng H, Thiagaletchumi M, Fadzly N. Evaluation of sublethal effects of Ipomoea cairica
Linn. extract on life history traits of dengue vectors. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo
Zuharah WF, Yousaf A. Assessment of Gluta renghas
L. and Mangifera indica
L. (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae) extracts on the sublethal effects of dengue vector. J Asia Pac Entomol
Francine TN, Cabral BNP, Anatole PC, Bruno MM, Pauline N, Jeanne NY. Larvicidal activities of hydro-ethanolic extracts of three Cameroonian medicinal plants against Aedes albopictus. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed
Carolino AT, Paula AR, Silva CP, Butt TM, Samuels RI. Monitoring persistence of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae
under simulated field conditions with the aim of controlling adult Aedes aegypti
(Diptera: Culicidae). Parasit Vectors
Park Y. Entomopathogenic bacterium, Xenorhabdus nematophila
and Photorhabdus luminescens
, enhances Bacillus thuringiensis
Cry4Ba toxicity against yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti
(Diptera: Culicidae). J Asia Pac Entomol
Park Y, Kyo Jung J, Kim Y. A mixture of Bacillus thuringiensis
with Xenorhabdus nematophila
-cultured broth enhances toxicity against mosquitoes Aedes albopictus
and Culex pipiens pallens
(Diptera: Culicidae). J Econ Entomol
Setha T, Chantha N, Benjamin S, Socheat D. Bacterial larvicide, Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis
strain AM 65-52 water dispersible granule formulation impacts both dengue vector, Aedes aegypti
(L.) population density and disease transmission in Cambodia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis
(9): e0004973. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd. 0004973.
Mohiddin A, Lasim AM, Zuharah WF. Susceptibility of Aedes albopictus
from dengue outbreak areas to temephos and Bacillus thuringiensis
subsp. israelensis. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed
Gama ZP, Nakagoshi N, Suharjono, Setyowati F. Toxicity studies for indigenous Bacillus thuringiensis
isolates from Malang city, East Java on Aedes aegypti
larvae. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed
Marcombe S, Darriet F, Agnew P, Etienne M, Yp-Tcha MM, Yébakima A, et al. Field efficacy of new larvicide products for control of multi-resistant Aedes aegypti
populations in Martinique (French West Indies). Am J Trop Med Hyg
Tetreau G, Stalinski R, David JP, Després L. Monitoring resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis
in the field by performing bioassays with each Cry toxin separately. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz
da Silva OS, Prado GR, da Silva JL, Silva CE, da Costa M, Heermann R. Oral toxicity of Photorhabdus luminescens
and Xenorhabdus nematophila
(Enterobacteriaceae) against Aedes aegypti
(Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res
Fang XL, Li ZZ, Wang YH, Zhang X. In vitro
and in vivo
antimicrobial activity of Xenorhabdus bovienii
YL002 against Phytophthora capsici
and Botrytis cinerea. J Appl Microbiol
Hu X, Liu Z, Li Y, Ding X, Xia L, Hu S. PirB-Cry2Aa hybrid protein exhibits enhanced insecticidal activity against Spodoptera exigua
larvae. J Invertebr Pathol
Li Y, Hu X, Zhang X, Liu Z, Ding X, Xia L, et al. Photorhabdus luminescens
PirAB-fusion protein exhibits both cytotoxicity and insecticidal activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett
Grundmann F, Kaiser M, Schiell M, Batzer A, Kurz M, Thanwisai A, et al. Antiparasitic chaiyaphumines from entomopathogenic Xenorhabdus
sp. PB61.4. J Nat Prod
Bock CH, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Wedge DE, Cantrell CL. Identification of the antifungal compound, trans-cinnamic acid, produced by Photorhabdus luminescens
, a potential biopesticide against pecan scab. J Pest Sci
Ullah I, Khan AL, Ali L, Khan AR, Waqas M, Hussain J, et al. Benzaldehyde as an insecticidal, antimicrobial, and antioxidant compound produced by Photorhabdus temperata
M1021. J Microbiol
Shi D, An R, Zhang W, Zhang G, Yu Z. Stilbene derivatives from Photorhabdus temperata
SN259 and their antifungal activities against phytopathogenic fungi. J Agric Food Chem
Bode HB. Entomopathogenic bacteria as a source of secondary metabolites. Curr Opin Chem Biol
Ahantarig A, Chantawat N, Waterfield NR, Ffrench-Constant R, Kittayapong P. PirAB toxin from Photorhabdus asymbiotica
as a larvicide against dengue vectors. Appl Environ Microbiol
Ferreira T, van Reenen CA, Endo A, Spröer C, Malan AP, Dicks LM. Description of Xenorhabdus khoisanae
sp. nov., the symbiont of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema khoisanae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol
Ferreira T, van Reenen CA, Pages S, Tailliez P, Malan AP, Dicks LM. Photorhabdus luminescens
subsp. nov., a symbiotic bacterium associated with a novel Heterorhabditis
species related to Heterorhabditis indica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol
Ferreira T, van Reenen CA, Endo A, Tailliez P, Pagès S, Spröer C, et al. Photorhabdus heterorhabditis
sp. nov., a symbiont of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis zealandica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol
Tailliez P, Laroui C, Ginibre N, Paule A, Pages S, Boemare N. Phylogeny of Photorhabdus
based on universally conserved protein-coding sequences and implications for the taxonomy of these two genera. Proposal of new taxa: X. vietnamensis
sp. nov., P. luminescens
subsp. nov., P. luminescens
subsp. nov., P. temperata
subsp. nov., P. temperata
subsp. nov., and the reclassification of P. luminescens
as P. temperata
comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol
Thanwisai A, Tandhavanant S, Saiprom N, Waterfield NR, Ke Long P, Bode HB, et al. Diversity of Xenorhabdus
spp. and their symbiotic entomopathogenic nematodes from Thailand. PLoS One
(9): e43835. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone. 0043835.
Bussaman P, Sa-Uth C, Rattanasena P, Chandrapatya A. Acaricidal activities of whole cell suspension, cell-free supernatant, and crude cell extract of Xenorhabdus stockiae
against mushroom mite (Luciaphorus
sp.). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B
Bussaman P, Rattanasena P. Additional property of Xenorhabdus stockiae
for inhibiting cow mastitis-causing bacteria. Biosci Biotech Res Asia
Kronenwerth M, Bozhüyük KA, Kahnt AS, Steinhilber D, Gaudriault S, Kaiser M, et al. Characterisation of taxlllaids A-G; natural products from Xenorhabdus indica. Chemistry
Pranaw K, Singh S, Dutta D, Singh N, Sharma G, Ganguly S, et al. Extracellular novel metalloprotease from Xenorhabdus indica
and its potential as an insecticidal agent. J Microbiol Biotechnol
Fukruksa C, Yimthin T, Suwannaroj M, Muangpat P, Tandhavanant S, Thanwisai A, et al. Isolation and identification of Xenorhabdus
bacteria associated with entomopathogenic nematodes and their larvicidal activity against Aedes aegypti. Parasit Vect
Nollmann FI, Heinrich AK, Brachmann AO, Morisseau C, Mukherjee K, Casanova-Torres ÁM., et al. A Photorhabdus
natural product inhibits insect juvenile hormone epoxide hydrolase. Chembiochem
Muangpat P, Yooyangket T, Fukruksa C, Suwannaroj M, Yimthin T, Sitthisak S, et al. Screening of the antimicrobial activity against drug resistant bacteria of Photorhabdus
associated with entomopathogenic nematodes from Mae Wong National Park, Thailand. Front Microbiol
Owuama CI. Entomopathogenic symbiotic bacteria, Xenorhabdus
of nematodes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Assessing the Pathogenicity of Two Bacteria Isolated from the Entomopathogenic Nematode Heterorhabditis indica against Galleria mellonella and Some Pest Insects
| ||Rosalba Salgado-Morales,Fernando Martínez-Ocampo,Verónica Obregón-Barboza,Kathia Vilchis-Martínez,Alfredo Jiménez-Pérez,Edgar Dantán-González |
| ||Insects. 2019; 10(3): 83 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Biocontrol and non-target effect of fractions and compound isolated from Streptomyces rimosus on the immature stages of filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) and the compound interaction with Acetylcholinesterase (AChE1)
| ||Pathalam Ganesan,Antony Stalin,Micheal Gabriel Paulraj,Kedike Balakrishna,Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu,Naif Abdullah Al-Dhabi |
| ||Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2018; 161: 120 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Acaricidal effect of cell-free supernatants from Xenorhabdus and Photorhabdus bacteria against Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)
| ||Ceren Eroglu,Harun Cimen,Derya Ulug,Mehmet Karagoz,Selcuk Hazir,Ibrahim Cakmak |
| ||Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|